I moved
here.
Monday, March 27, 2006
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Can A Import A Replica Sword Into Canada
Women in the Middle Ages
WRALLY: Ola
PIER: Hey. How are you?
WRALLY: Bien and you?
PIER: Do you feel the focus of all these days? You are truly a diva. To start the lipstick, I dyed my hair platinum blonde and you put the fishnet stockings
WRALLY For me, no one has clear speech to the bio-based choices to be made ..... With Matt and ste we talked two hours and we just happen .... Imagine e-mail ....
PIER: Well you know in a dispute between yes and no, or is or is not. Deliver an address to the possibility 'for others to simplify your location. I do not think voting is an act that expresses a personal opinion, vote expresses general opinion and shared. You and Formigoni, in the sense you're in the same boat. Like it or not, and despite the many distinctions of the 'cause of choice
WRALLY: The problem for me is the simplification propio on subjects so important .... the next step will be cloning for therapeutic purposes ..... I do not care about me who takes sides on my side .... or who is otherwise ....
PIER: I do not see the harm in cloning for therapeutic purposes. Especially in the case of gametes. by hypothesis and then apologizes, clone seventy carol's cousin, Charlotte, would be a good thing.
WRALLY: depends very much on the technical .... The research protocols and more advanced with further results are based on developments in adult stem cells ...... Current techniques do not allow a significant success with embryonic stem cells. Similar processes in science and ethics must go hand in hand if not the risks are catastrophic for the species ....
PIER: It 's true the opposite, research on stem cells derived from umbilical cord or adult organisms and' almost completely devoid of outlets
WRALLY: you are misinformed .. I read some excerpts of articles from magazines expressing the statistics ..... The embryonic stem cells are specialized and too little can not be handled at this stage without creating the appearance of tumors
PIER : You are misinformed. Embryonic stem cells are valuable because of their high ductility '. As with the adults there you can 'make a Belina. In the U.S. the scientific community and 'exasperated because the embryonic stem cell lines are contaminated and unusable, and these assholes Republicans prohibit the use of new cells derived from embryos discarded by fertility clinics. The federal government allows research only on cells taken from adults. Anyway, the Catholic movement in defense of life and 'strong enough to cripple any statistics.
WRALLY: I'll take what I read ..... on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD):
"Data analysis of five scientific papers shows that about 1,347 embryos analyzed:
- 761 (56.5%) were abnormal (and therefore never transferred to the uterus)
- 583 (43.3%) were transferred
- 39 (2, 9% in the total, compared with 6.7% transferred deemed healthy) have come to birth. [A. Serra: X General Assembly of the Pontifical Academy Pr ... "
PIER: I advise you to read and I still
WRALLY: mica sure I'll stop ... but you have no idea of \u200b\u200bthe difference between mitosis, meiosis, haploid cells and diploid cells ......?
PIER: I have no idea ... but this is stuff that has to do with stem cells? this and 'implantation of embryos created in vitro. I have ideas and context - or rather I can not 'care less - that the union of egg and sperm create something different. life and 'elsewhere
WRALLY: you know what are the biological mechanisms that regulate fertilization?
PIER: bees and flowers,
WRALLY: ... I'm thrilled ....
PIER: Luke, and your 'religion. religion is not imposed by law
WRALLY: when you think life begins?
PIER: the birth
WRALLY ..... but have you ever seen a 'U.S.? Have you ever heard to move the belly of a pregnant woman?
PIER: luca life and 'choice of the mother until the mother wants, if she can', get rid of the child in his / her stomach I do not give nothing that is born. what matters' what the mother wants to make
WRALLY: leave me speechless ... you are more backward s agostino ....
PIER: luca life and 'something that lasts a lifetime. There are many reasons that make it better than the idea of \u200b\u200bnot being born than to be born by force
WRALLY: I can understand .... the mother can not be in control of the life of his son / daughter ...
PIER: Your e 'a dogma of faith, and you are supporting a movement that wants to take away the right of women to decide. Support that is' with your act of faith a political movement. I mean 'you want to become master of life. Your principle is a very wrong and why authoritarian ' shared by a minority that wants to impose other
WRALLY, but absolutely no ... science says that the fusion of the nuclei of two gametes, there is a single continuous process that normally leads to the birth of a new individual .. is not a dogma of faith and biology .....
PIER: the dogma of faith and 'defend' my 'gametes as if "your". I am of what you call life, in that case, I do not care. for me and 'a pile of cells without effect. The moral is not made with the union of cells. The moral is done with the extent of rights and duties of individuals and respect for mutual freedom
WRALLY I try to defend the rights of the unborn that is best weakness of the situation ...... You will demonstrate medieval if you call "cell pile of nonsense" the process that allows the continuation of a species. The rights must be defended are those of the subjects innazittutto + weak ...
PIER: Luke, I insist, to say that the bundle of cells and is a 'subject' is not only 'a religious principle but it' s also an act against the law
WRALLY: you can not pretend that the embryo or the fetus are growths inside the mother's ..... this is not a piece of liver or intestine .....
PIER: the mother's authority 'office about what she was pregnant and I will fight' with his teeth to defend yourself, that freedom '. By you and Formigoni
WRALLY: are two irreconcilable positions ...
PIER: right and that's great that they are. What is bad and 'you the deprivation of liberty of others' make a political battle, calling the defense of the most' weak. Not only is 'hypocrite, and' insulting
WRALLY: you do not take into account either the father's rights .... the mother alone does not create the cell pile of nonsense ... I am defending a principle bigger ....
PIER: and that is enough to give you the right to impose what must and must not do? You defend the pontifical law, defend
WRALLY: personal freedom, personal freedom is limited by the next ... in a "civil" society. I do not impose anything to anyone .....
PIER: yes, unfortunately, powerful lobbies such as that are the first victims are doing our best to limit those freedoms'. 're just a pawn. Unfortunately
WRALLY: I am sorry that you have so little consideration of my thoughts .....
PIER: I respect your thoughts. non-compliance and the fact that 'a party program, despite your good faith. others make it a party program
and use your good heart and your instinct to "defend the 'weak'
WRALLY: cmq consider myself a person who seeks to obtain information as freely as possible and + parts ... . then I think I have enough common sense to know how to decide which idea to express .... I repeat: I do not care to see what others are doing and why .... I can tell, grind and decide ....
PIER: The thing I've said before, and the statistics cited above show that not tell you enough
WRALLY: those who believe to be informed but speaks only slogan is a poor ...
PIER: I agree. the core, I repeat, not 'in what you believe but that imposes on others. my and your moral positions are irreconcilable, it is true, but you can not force myself to your law and I want to leave you free to do as you think
WRALLY: I do not impose anything ..... In the specific case ... there is a law ... proposed to repeal some parts .... I can tell, not I share these repeals .... I decide what is the best way to express my idea .... here in a schematic way how it went ...
PIER: no. you can not forget the context in which the debate is moving. as seen in a game of chess only the exchange of two pedestrians. the game, if you see the other, shows how the exchange of pedestrians 'part of a strategy game more' wide. Find out how he wants to win the white and black as you want to defend, to understand the importance of the exchange of pawns. You, not voting, you have contributed to the victory of a player that evil aims in the coming years to limit the freedom 'of women in the name of a dogmatic defense of the principle of life
WRALLY: six medieval when you express yourself so ..... because now you would like to limit the freedom of women?
PIER: you shine. you want. and if you do not see are blind
WRALLY: ultimately these issues will play in the future of the species ..... explain why today we would like to limit the freedom of the woman in your vision ... I'll explain why if the ethics are not traveling with the science we risk the extinction of species
PIER: I do not know why ', I I ask myself 'cause sometimes the story takes folds so authoritarian
WRALLY me if there are key .... sustain an' idea ..... based on a feeling??
PIER: no, sorry, not ' a feeling, is going on. the result of the referendum and it 'the last demonstration. if you ask me why 'and' created a movement so 'conservative and retrograde, then I can not answer instead. probably a pocket of ignorance that has' spread among the children of the postwar
WRALLY: wriggling from the basic question .... but you did not notice that Western society is male-ela pure?? that finance and politics are in the hands of men and Oldest?? Women are certainly not afraid!! a gentlemen .....
PIER: I do not understand, better explained
WRALLY: you say that there is a plan that seeks to limit the freedom of the woman ....
PIER: among other freedom '
WRALLY you: I say that Western civilization is male .... does not need such an idiot ....
PIER: in fact there is no 'for an explanation of why' the world needs the principles of ultraconservative Ratzinger
WRALLY: Azzo but what?? Catholics worldwide are not ...... statistics are less than '% 8
PIER: you're asking me' cause there is a movement against freedom '(to which you belong). I do not know 'cause there is a movement of this kind. I would prefer that there was. Unfortunately, statistics are religious conservatives and how. are statistical and do politics. control among others, the United States and all funding to the third world and the criteria used
WRALLY: svegliaaaaaaaa if there is no reason ..... then they are all crazy or foolish, or you take firefly lanterns to ......
PIER: Do not be naive, the gear stuck in Italy with whom you have the answer to this referendum and 'terrible and enormous. or you're blind enough to not realize that you are expressing a position ultraestremista religious. in which case it is' even more 'worrying' cause you put a pole in the ass and not even notice you're
WRALLY: the Western world is controlled by 10 people from five multinational financial and socio-economic level. ... gentlemen interested only in their profit certainly not the limitation of women as such .... I'm sorry to know that I consider such a person back from getting caught by the nose .... mha ....
PIER: and I'm sorry you do not see the watermark of reality 'policy where you live
WRALLY: bbuò go now I go to bed ... I wish you good morning and good evening .... CIA PIER: hello. nice talking to you
WRALLY: sin is that we can not do it in person .... maybe I come to find we get drunk on beer and went on to explain .....
PIER: so now you're a Republican like Bush. A big step from the days of protests against the G8
WRALLY: Ola
PIER: Hey. How are you?
WRALLY: Bien and you?
PIER: Do you feel the focus of all these days? You are truly a diva. To start the lipstick, I dyed my hair platinum blonde and you put the fishnet stockings
WRALLY For me, no one has clear speech to the bio-based choices to be made ..... With Matt and ste we talked two hours and we just happen .... Imagine e-mail ....
PIER: Well you know in a dispute between yes and no, or is or is not. Deliver an address to the possibility 'for others to simplify your location. I do not think voting is an act that expresses a personal opinion, vote expresses general opinion and shared. You and Formigoni, in the sense you're in the same boat. Like it or not, and despite the many distinctions of the 'cause of choice
WRALLY: The problem for me is the simplification propio on subjects so important .... the next step will be cloning for therapeutic purposes ..... I do not care about me who takes sides on my side .... or who is otherwise ....
PIER: I do not see the harm in cloning for therapeutic purposes. Especially in the case of gametes. by hypothesis and then apologizes, clone seventy carol's cousin, Charlotte, would be a good thing.
WRALLY: depends very much on the technical .... The research protocols and more advanced with further results are based on developments in adult stem cells ...... Current techniques do not allow a significant success with embryonic stem cells. Similar processes in science and ethics must go hand in hand if not the risks are catastrophic for the species ....
PIER: It 's true the opposite, research on stem cells derived from umbilical cord or adult organisms and' almost completely devoid of outlets
WRALLY: you are misinformed .. I read some excerpts of articles from magazines expressing the statistics ..... The embryonic stem cells are specialized and too little can not be handled at this stage without creating the appearance of tumors
PIER : You are misinformed. Embryonic stem cells are valuable because of their high ductility '. As with the adults there you can 'make a Belina. In the U.S. the scientific community and 'exasperated because the embryonic stem cell lines are contaminated and unusable, and these assholes Republicans prohibit the use of new cells derived from embryos discarded by fertility clinics. The federal government allows research only on cells taken from adults. Anyway, the Catholic movement in defense of life and 'strong enough to cripple any statistics.
WRALLY: I'll take what I read ..... on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD):
"Data analysis of five scientific papers shows that about 1,347 embryos analyzed:
- 761 (56.5%) were abnormal (and therefore never transferred to the uterus)
- 583 (43.3%) were transferred
- 39 (2, 9% in the total, compared with 6.7% transferred deemed healthy) have come to birth. [A. Serra: X General Assembly of the Pontifical Academy Pr ... "
PIER: I advise you to read and I still
WRALLY: mica sure I'll stop ... but you have no idea of \u200b\u200bthe difference between mitosis, meiosis, haploid cells and diploid cells ......?
PIER: I have no idea ... but this is stuff that has to do with stem cells? this and 'implantation of embryos created in vitro. I have ideas and context - or rather I can not 'care less - that the union of egg and sperm create something different. life and 'elsewhere
WRALLY: you know what are the biological mechanisms that regulate fertilization?
PIER: bees and flowers,
WRALLY: ... I'm thrilled ....
PIER: Luke, and your 'religion. religion is not imposed by law
WRALLY: when you think life begins?
PIER: the birth
WRALLY ..... but have you ever seen a 'U.S.? Have you ever heard to move the belly of a pregnant woman?
PIER: luca life and 'choice of the mother until the mother wants, if she can', get rid of the child in his / her stomach I do not give nothing that is born. what matters' what the mother wants to make
WRALLY: leave me speechless ... you are more backward s agostino ....
PIER: luca life and 'something that lasts a lifetime. There are many reasons that make it better than the idea of \u200b\u200bnot being born than to be born by force
WRALLY: I can understand .... the mother can not be in control of the life of his son / daughter ...
PIER: Your e 'a dogma of faith, and you are supporting a movement that wants to take away the right of women to decide. Support that is' with your act of faith a political movement. I mean 'you want to become master of life. Your principle is a very wrong and why authoritarian ' shared by a minority that wants to impose other
WRALLY, but absolutely no ... science says that the fusion of the nuclei of two gametes, there is a single continuous process that normally leads to the birth of a new individual .. is not a dogma of faith and biology .....
PIER: the dogma of faith and 'defend' my 'gametes as if "your". I am of what you call life, in that case, I do not care. for me and 'a pile of cells without effect. The moral is not made with the union of cells. The moral is done with the extent of rights and duties of individuals and respect for mutual freedom
WRALLY I try to defend the rights of the unborn that is best weakness of the situation ...... You will demonstrate medieval if you call "cell pile of nonsense" the process that allows the continuation of a species. The rights must be defended are those of the subjects innazittutto + weak ...
PIER: Luke, I insist, to say that the bundle of cells and is a 'subject' is not only 'a religious principle but it' s also an act against the law
WRALLY: you can not pretend that the embryo or the fetus are growths inside the mother's ..... this is not a piece of liver or intestine .....
PIER: the mother's authority 'office about what she was pregnant and I will fight' with his teeth to defend yourself, that freedom '. By you and Formigoni
WRALLY: are two irreconcilable positions ...
PIER: right and that's great that they are. What is bad and 'you the deprivation of liberty of others' make a political battle, calling the defense of the most' weak. Not only is 'hypocrite, and' insulting
WRALLY: you do not take into account either the father's rights .... the mother alone does not create the cell pile of nonsense ... I am defending a principle bigger ....
PIER: and that is enough to give you the right to impose what must and must not do? You defend the pontifical law, defend
WRALLY: personal freedom, personal freedom is limited by the next ... in a "civil" society. I do not impose anything to anyone .....
PIER: yes, unfortunately, powerful lobbies such as that are the first victims are doing our best to limit those freedoms'. 're just a pawn. Unfortunately
WRALLY: I am sorry that you have so little consideration of my thoughts .....
PIER: I respect your thoughts. non-compliance and the fact that 'a party program, despite your good faith. others make it a party program
and use your good heart and your instinct to "defend the 'weak'
WRALLY: cmq consider myself a person who seeks to obtain information as freely as possible and + parts ... . then I think I have enough common sense to know how to decide which idea to express .... I repeat: I do not care to see what others are doing and why .... I can tell, grind and decide ....
PIER: The thing I've said before, and the statistics cited above show that not tell you enough
WRALLY: those who believe to be informed but speaks only slogan is a poor ...
PIER: I agree. the core, I repeat, not 'in what you believe but that imposes on others. my and your moral positions are irreconcilable, it is true, but you can not force myself to your law and I want to leave you free to do as you think
WRALLY: I do not impose anything ..... In the specific case ... there is a law ... proposed to repeal some parts .... I can tell, not I share these repeals .... I decide what is the best way to express my idea .... here in a schematic way how it went ...
PIER: no. you can not forget the context in which the debate is moving. as seen in a game of chess only the exchange of two pedestrians. the game, if you see the other, shows how the exchange of pedestrians 'part of a strategy game more' wide. Find out how he wants to win the white and black as you want to defend, to understand the importance of the exchange of pawns. You, not voting, you have contributed to the victory of a player that evil aims in the coming years to limit the freedom 'of women in the name of a dogmatic defense of the principle of life
WRALLY: six medieval when you express yourself so ..... because now you would like to limit the freedom of women?
PIER: you shine. you want. and if you do not see are blind
WRALLY: ultimately these issues will play in the future of the species ..... explain why today we would like to limit the freedom of the woman in your vision ... I'll explain why if the ethics are not traveling with the science we risk the extinction of species
PIER: I do not know why ', I I ask myself 'cause sometimes the story takes folds so authoritarian
WRALLY me if there are key .... sustain an' idea ..... based on a feeling??
PIER: no, sorry, not ' a feeling, is going on. the result of the referendum and it 'the last demonstration. if you ask me why 'and' created a movement so 'conservative and retrograde, then I can not answer instead. probably a pocket of ignorance that has' spread among the children of the postwar
WRALLY: wriggling from the basic question .... but you did not notice that Western society is male-ela pure?? that finance and politics are in the hands of men and Oldest?? Women are certainly not afraid!! a gentlemen .....
PIER: I do not understand, better explained
WRALLY: you say that there is a plan that seeks to limit the freedom of the woman ....
PIER: among other freedom '
WRALLY you: I say that Western civilization is male .... does not need such an idiot ....
PIER: in fact there is no 'for an explanation of why' the world needs the principles of ultraconservative Ratzinger
WRALLY: Azzo but what?? Catholics worldwide are not ...... statistics are less than '% 8
PIER: you're asking me' cause there is a movement against freedom '(to which you belong). I do not know 'cause there is a movement of this kind. I would prefer that there was. Unfortunately, statistics are religious conservatives and how. are statistical and do politics. control among others, the United States and all funding to the third world and the criteria used
WRALLY: svegliaaaaaaaa if there is no reason ..... then they are all crazy or foolish, or you take firefly lanterns to ......
PIER: Do not be naive, the gear stuck in Italy with whom you have the answer to this referendum and 'terrible and enormous. or you're blind enough to not realize that you are expressing a position ultraestremista religious. in which case it is' even more 'worrying' cause you put a pole in the ass and not even notice you're
WRALLY: the Western world is controlled by 10 people from five multinational financial and socio-economic level. ... gentlemen interested only in their profit certainly not the limitation of women as such .... I'm sorry to know that I consider such a person back from getting caught by the nose .... mha ....
PIER: and I'm sorry you do not see the watermark of reality 'policy where you live
WRALLY: bbuò go now I go to bed ... I wish you good morning and good evening .... CIA PIER: hello. nice talking to you
WRALLY: sin is that we can not do it in person .... maybe I come to find we get drunk on beer and went on to explain .....
PIER: so now you're a Republican like Bush. A big step from the days of protests against the G8
Friday, January 14, 2005
How To Darken Half-head Of Highlights
Pentagon weapons designs "aphrodisiac", enemies, debauched, go wild in sex orgies
The Pentagon would consider the development of a new generation of chemical weapons "aphrodisiac" which, though not lethal, the effect avebbero to distract enemy soldiers and weaken under the weight of an irresistible hormonal storm. The bombs would be an aphrodisiac that can cause the enemies irresistible homosexual impulses, to the detriment, according to U.S. military leadership, morale in battle and of discipline. The documents reveal top secret Pentagon cited by the online site of the magazine New Scientist.
But the warheads armed with "the elixir of love" are not the only ambitious project by scientists at the Pentagon. Ricercartori The Pentagon does not seem at all daunted by the bizarre.
Among other assumptions made in the documents there are chemical weapons that attract swarms of wasps among the enemy ranks, which are capable of driving hordes of sewer rats on military targets by making them uninhabitable.
sounds like a joke: Researchers have developed a system to cause enemy in a "pronounced and lasting halitosis". The system is particularly effective against guerrillas who want to mingle with the civilian population and that would be recognized in this way, "a nose".
The proposals were developed within the Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, who studies the development of alternative arsenals over ten years. The laboratory is funded by the Pentagon to devise new ways "to disrupt, distract and lead to discovered "the enemy by means of chemicals.
Edward Hammond, a spokesman for the State Department was not able to confirm if the program, which would require funding of $ 7.5 million in six years, ever reached the stage of execution.
The Pentagon would consider the development of a new generation of chemical weapons "aphrodisiac" which, though not lethal, the effect avebbero to distract enemy soldiers and weaken under the weight of an irresistible hormonal storm. The bombs would be an aphrodisiac that can cause the enemies irresistible homosexual impulses, to the detriment, according to U.S. military leadership, morale in battle and of discipline. The documents reveal top secret Pentagon cited by the online site of the magazine New Scientist.
But the warheads armed with "the elixir of love" are not the only ambitious project by scientists at the Pentagon. Ricercartori The Pentagon does not seem at all daunted by the bizarre.
Among other assumptions made in the documents there are chemical weapons that attract swarms of wasps among the enemy ranks, which are capable of driving hordes of sewer rats on military targets by making them uninhabitable.
sounds like a joke: Researchers have developed a system to cause enemy in a "pronounced and lasting halitosis". The system is particularly effective against guerrillas who want to mingle with the civilian population and that would be recognized in this way, "a nose".
The proposals were developed within the Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, who studies the development of alternative arsenals over ten years. The laboratory is funded by the Pentagon to devise new ways "to disrupt, distract and lead to discovered "the enemy by means of chemicals.
Edward Hammond, a spokesman for the State Department was not able to confirm if the program, which would require funding of $ 7.5 million in six years, ever reached the stage of execution.
Friday, December 17, 2004
How To Put Your Head On A Hairstyle
Stripper Texas license required to perform wearing
Nude yes', but never without a regular license stuck on the skin. The city council of San Antonio, Texas, passed a law requiring strippers to wear permits during their regular performances on stage.
The initiative has sparked violent controversies since 'the name on display allows customers to trace enamored of the dancers back to their homes.
The new regulation and
'was unanimously approved' by the government of the city 'Friday' last year. According to the counselors will help 'the police to identify the other stripper who disobey orders against nudity' and contact with customers.
A lawyer, on behalf of several strip clubs in the city, 'he argued that the anonymity of the girls and' an essential guarantee for their safety from possible attacks and unwanted visits. The plates to wear reveals its true name and surname.
Nude yes', but never without a regular license stuck on the skin. The city council of San Antonio, Texas, passed a law requiring strippers to wear permits during their regular performances on stage.
The initiative has sparked violent controversies since 'the name on display allows customers to trace enamored of the dancers back to their homes.
The new regulation and
'was unanimously approved' by the government of the city 'Friday' last year. According to the counselors will help 'the police to identify the other stripper who disobey orders against nudity' and contact with customers.
A lawyer, on behalf of several strip clubs in the city, 'he argued that the anonymity of the girls and' an essential guarantee for their safety from possible attacks and unwanted visits. The plates to wear reveals its true name and surname.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)